Legal Opinion
In Re Binstock
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 13, 1963PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CASHIN, District Judge.
Milton Binstock, as owner of the Pleasure Craft INA B II, has filed a petition, pursuant to 46 U.S.C. § 183 et seq., seeking exoneration from or limitation of liability for damages asserted by the claimants as a result of the deaths of Samuel Glassberg and Murray Friedman. The claimants are Dolores Glassberg, Executrix of the Estate of Samuel Glass-berg, and Mildred Friedman, Executrix of the Estate of Murray Friedman.
I find that the petitioner, Milton Binstock, purchased the INA B II, a 30'6" Owens cabin cruiser, in late 1956 or early 1957. The INA B II was equipped…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Spencer Kellogg & Sons, Inc. v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Murphy v. Steeplechase Amusement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Echavarria v. Atlantic & Caribbean Steam Nav. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1935
- The Black GullCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- The WinnipegDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Aramark Sports & Entertainment Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Binstock v. FriedmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Binstock v. FriedmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964