Legal Opinion
Sautter v. Fulmer
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 5, 1932PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Brien, J.
The Utica Sunday Tribune Company had an authorized capital of $60,000 divided into six hundred shares. These seven plaintiffs together with one other stockholder owned a minority interest of two hundred and ninety-three shares. Defendants owned the majority interest consisting of three hundred and seven shares. All the capital stock was purchased by Erwin R. Davenport, Frank E. Gannett and Woodford J. Copeland. The complaint in each action alleges that defendant Fulmer, prior to the sale, dominated the management of the corporation, that, as the principal negotiator of the sale, he…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Murray v. . BeardNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Underhill v. . SchenckNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Falk v. . HoffmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Giblin v. MurphyNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Glenn v. Hoteltron Systems Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Mayflower Hotel Stockholders Protective Committee v. Mayflower Hotel Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Mayflower Hotel Stockholders Protective Committee v. Mayflower Hotel Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
- Levy v. American Beverage Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.