Matthews v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DICKSON, Justice.
Defendant Mark Matthews appeals following his conviction of child molesting, a class B felony. Among other issues presented, defendant contends that the trial court erred in its admission of hearsay evidence which constituted the principal proof of guilt.
Pursuant to Ind.Code § 35-37-4-6, the State had petitioned to introduce out-of-court statements of a female child, the alleged victim, as heard by her father and stepmother. From 10:00 a.m. on Saturday, January 5, to 6:00 p.m. Sunday, January 6, the child had been with her non-custodial mother, with whom defendant resided.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Spears v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Spears v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Spears v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Ketcham v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
- Clipp v. WeaverIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hoglund v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- Creager v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Roach v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. PetryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- Allgire v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.