Legal Opinion

Goode v. Drew Building Supply, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 12, 1999PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint and denied plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment. The causes of action alleging age discrimination in violation of Executive Law § 296 are barred by the release executed by plaintiff upon termination of his employment. We reject the contention that the validity of that release is to be determined in accordance with the standards set forth in the Older Worker Benefit Protection Act (29 USC § 626 [f]; see, Dewey v PTT Telecom Netherlands, U. S., 1995…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mangini v. McClurgNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Skluth v. United Merchants & Manufacturers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Stone v. National Bank & Trust CompanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. Metz v. MetzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  5. Nicholas v. Nynex, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Lebanese American UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Livingston v. Bev-Pak, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2000
  3. Beebe v. New York Times Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
  4. Rivera v. Sovereign BankDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
  5. Putnam v. KiblerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API