Anglin v. State

Charles Anglin appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. Anglin’s motion charged his appellate attorney with ineffective assistance for failing to challenge the denial of his motion to suppress incriminating statements he had given to the police prior to receiving Miranda warnings. We affirm.

We view the evidence at trial in the light most favorable to the verdict. See State v. Hall, 982 S.W.2d 675, 680 (Mo. banc 1998).

The evidence showed that Anglin and his accomplice arrived at a car wash with the intent of stealing a car. When they saw the victim washing his car, Anglin shot him with a…