Legal Opinion

Donoho v. United States

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided December 24, 1958No. Civ. No. 6-57-97PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONOVAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff brings this suit to recover an allegedly erroneous assessment of income taxes in the total amount of $3,490.44 with interest. Said sum was collected by defendant for the taxable period May 10, 1951, through December 31,1951, and for the year 1952. This case has to do only with the years 1951 and 1952.

Plaintiff is the transferee of the estate of her father, Dr. W. L. Burnap, who, prior to his death on May 9, 1951, was associated with five other medical doctors as partners in the practice of their profession in the city of Fergus Falls, Minnesota, and carried…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. James M. Tunnell, Jr., and Mildred S. Tunnell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
  2. Paul W. Trousdale v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Marguerite R. Trousdale v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  3. United States v. SnowCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  4. Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
  5. United States v. ShapiroCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Walter L. Berry and Clover G. Berry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
  2. United States v. Barbara B. DonohoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  3. Safford v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API