Legal Opinion

Bombard v. Department of Labor

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 8, 2010No. 2009-380, MAY TERM, 2010Published

1Opinion of the Court

2010 VT 100

John Bombard, Jr.

v.

Department of Labor (Fisher Auto Parts, Inc., Employer)

No. 2009-380, MAY TERM, 2010.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

Filed November 8, 2010.

ENTRY ORDER

In the above-entitled cause, the Clerk will enter:

¶ 1. Claimant appeals the denial of his request for unemployment benefits. On appeal, claimant argues that the hostile work environment at his job provided good cause to quit, and that the Board's conclusion otherwise is not supported by the findings. We disagree, and affirm.

¶ 2. The facts found by the Board can be summarized as follows. Claimant worked for employer Fisher…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kasnowski v. Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
  2. Allen v. Department of Employment & TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  3. Skudlarek v. Department of Employment & TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993
  4. Eulo v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEAL COM'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. Langlois v. Department of Employment & TrainingSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API