Legal Opinion
Agostini v. De Antueno
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided February 20, 1950PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCulkin, J.
The tenant herein appears specially and moves to vacate the service of the precept and to dismiss the same on the ground that this court has no jurisdiction of the person of the tenant, pursuant to rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice and as provided for in the Constitution of the United States and former section 256 of the Judicial Code of the United States (now U. S. Code, tit. 28, § 1251).
The tenant is a national and natural born citizen of the Republic of Argentina. He is the Third Secretary of the Permanent Delegation of Argentina to the United Nations.
*192Article Y of the Headquarters…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hammer v. DagenhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Ohio Ex Rel. Popovici v. AglerSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Allen v. RileySupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Woods v. O'BRIENDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1948
- Siemssen v. BoferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
3Cited by5 opinions
- Logan v. DupuisDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
- Rhee v. DahanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1982
- De Miglio v. PaezAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1959
- 2 Tudor City Place Associates v. Libyan Arab Republic Mission to U. N.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1983
- New York City Housing Authority v. PenaCity of New York Municipal Court · 1953