Legal Opinion
Craven v. Apfel
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 12, 1999No. 98Civ. 7326 (LAP)(AJP)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
PRESKA, District Judge.
Plaintiff Hannah Craven brings this action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 45 U.S.C. § 405(g), challenging the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her disability benefits. Both parties cross-moved for judgement on the pleadings pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c). On May 18, 1999, Magistrate Judge Peck issued a report and recommendation (the “Report”), which recommended that I grant plaintiffs motion to the extent that the case be remanded to the Commissioner for further development of…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Correale-Englehart v. AstrueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Polanco v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Laboriel v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- Sierra Diaz v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2024