Legal Opinion

Ludewig v. Rauch

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 13, 1957No. 10464Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing

Appellees cite three cases in support of their motion for rehearing. In the first, Armstrong v. Anderson, Tex.Civ.App., El Paso, 70 S.W.2d 801, writ dismissed, the Court held that an inadequate bond given in a certiorari proceeding from the county to the district court was sufficient to confer jurisdiction on the district court.

Brown v. Mataska, Tex.Civ.App., Fort Worth, 262 S.W. 932, no writ history, involved a certiorari proceeding from the justice to the county court and no certiorari bond having been filed although seven terms of the county court had passed since…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. BilgerTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Armstrong v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Brown v. MataskaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API