Legal Opinion
Lundell v. Kindred
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 17, 1924No. 8523PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Appeal from Harris County Court; Murray B. Jones, Judge. Suit by J. G. Kindred against A. E. Dun-dell and others, in which named defendant filed cross-action. Judgment for plaintiff against named defendant, and he appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.
Both sides agree that this statement correctly reflects the nature and result of this proceeding below:
“This suit was instituted by the appellee, J. G. Kindred, against appellant, A. E. Dundell, and H. E. Beck and W. M. Boney, to recover damages for the breach of an agreement to insure an automobile subsequently destroyed by fire. Before trial a dismissal was entered as to Beck and Boney, and the cause of action was prosecuted against Dundell alone.
“Appellant, Dundell, by cross-action, sought to recover against appellee on six certain promissory notes executed by appellee and being each for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rishworth v. MossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Overton v. First Texas State Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- West Lumber Co. v. NashCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Rhodes v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wardlaw v. PaceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933