Jena McClellan v. Midwest Machining, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partThapar, Circuit Judge
Congress does not write statutes on a blank slate. Instead, it legislates against the backdrop of existing common law. So, when Congress wants to displace the existing common law, it must do so clearly. See A. Scalia & B. Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts § 52 (2012). Because Congress did not clearly override the common law ratification and tender-back doctrines when it passed Title VII or the Equal Pay Act, I would apply both rules in McClellan's case and remand for further fact-finding.
I
Jena McClellan claims that she entered into a release agreement with her employer…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local No. 391 v. TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Garrett v. Moore-McCormack Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.