Legal Opinion

Teco Investments, Inc. v. Taxation & Revenue Department

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided March 27, 1998No. 18068, 18071PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BOSSON, Judge.

{1} These consolidated cases involve a taxpayer, Chino Mines, who erroneously paid a tax it did not owe, a compensating use tax, and failed to pay a tax it did owe, a gross receipts tax. When it discovered the error, taxpayer invoked the doctrine of equitable recoupment and requested an offset of one tax for the other, as satisfaction in full, because the two taxes were identical in amount. The New Mexico Taxation and Revenue Department refused because fault for the mistake lay with the taxpayer and not the Department, a point which apparently is not in dispute. The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Stone v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Rothensies v. Electric Storage Battery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Wilmington Trust Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Estate of Frank Branson, Deceased Mary M. March v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Fadner v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. Montaño v. FrezzaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. Van EngelCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  5. Montaño v. FrezzaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API