Legal Opinion
Natural Resources Defense Council v. Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 29, 2006No. 04-1438PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge RANDOLPH.
Concurring opinion filed by Senior Circuit Judge EDWARDS.
RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge.
The United States and other countries entered into the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, Sept. 16, 1987, S. Treaty Doc. NO. 100-10, *2251522 U.N.T.S. 29 (“Montreal Protocol”), a treaty in which the signatory nations agreed to reduce the use of certain substances, including methyl bromide, that degrade the stratospheric ozone layer. The Environmental Protection Agency issued a rule implementing “critical use” exemptions from the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- National Ass'n of Clean Air Agencies v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Kingman Park Civic Association v. GrayDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. Andrew WheelerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
- Sierra Club v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.