Legal Opinion

Mousel v. Daringer

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1973No. 38633PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

The issues relate to priority of interests between an agister and a secured party and to liability of the agister for damage. The District Court, sitting in equity, found for the agister on his claims but against him on the damage claim. It accordingly decreased the amount of the judgment for the agister by the amount of damages awarded. The agister’s lien was adjudged superior to the security interest which concededly had been perfected. The secured party, State Securities, appeals, and the agister, Robert D. Mousel, Jr., cross-appeals.

SUMMARY OF RECORD'

On May 1, 1968, Mousel agreed in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. County Board of Supervisors of Platte Co. v. BreeseNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  2. R. Becker & Degen v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Kilpatrick v. Kansas City & Beatrice RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Hoerler v. PreyNebraska Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stuhr v. StuhrNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. United States v. Zac A. Crittenden, Jr., D/B/A Crittenden Tractor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. State v. KennedyNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Graff v. BurnettNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Circle 76 Fertilizer, Inc. v. NelsenNebraska Supreme Court · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API