Legal Opinion
Washington Dredging & Improvement Co. v. Washington
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 15, 1913No. 127PublishedCited by 2 opinions
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Washington.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam. Mr. W. F. Hays and Mr. Chas. E. Shepard for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Alfred Battle, Mr. George B. Cole, Mr. Richard A. Ballinger, Mr. George E. de Steiguer, Mr. Jas. A. Kerr, Mr. W. V. Tanner, Mr. Douglas C. Conover, Mr. Wm. M. Watson, Mr. Chas. W. Bunn, Mr. Ira Bronson, Mr. Jas. B. Murphy, Mr. Wm. B. Stratton and Mr. John C. Higgins for the defendants in error.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 1. Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Preston v. Chicago, 226 U. S. 447, 450; Wood v. Chesborough, 228 U. S. 672, 677. 2. Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102; Standard Oil…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Eustis v. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Wood v. ChesboroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Preston v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
3Cited by2 opinions
- Washington Dredging & Improvement Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Washington Dredging & Improvement Co. v. KinnearSupreme Court of the United States · 1915