Ross v. Rhay
Washington Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The United States Supreme Court vacated our judgment herein (51 Wn. (2d) 893, 318 P. (2d) 975; certiorari granted 357 U. S. 575, 2 L. Ed. (2d) 1547, 78 S. Ct. 1387) and ordered reconsideration in light of Eskridge v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms & Paroles, 357 U. S. 214, 2 L. Ed. (2d) 1269, 78 S. Ct. 1061.
Petitioner James E. Ross petitioned for habeas corpus on the ground that his constitutional rights were denied because of the refusal of the trial court to order a complete statement of facts at public expense upon his appeal from a judgment of conviction of first-degree murder. We…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Eskridge v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms & ParolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- In RE WOODS v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1959
- Ross v. SchnecklothSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- In RE GRADY v. SchnecklothWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of Ross v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1957
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 1960