Legal Opinion

Ross v. Rhay

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1959No. 34238PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The United States Supreme Court vacated our judgment herein (51 Wn. (2d) 893, 318 P. (2d) 975; certiorari granted 357 U. S. 575, 2 L. Ed. (2d) 1547, 78 S. Ct. 1387) and ordered reconsideration in light of Eskridge v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms & Paroles, 357 U. S. 214, 2 L. Ed. (2d) 1269, 78 S. Ct. 1061.

Petitioner James E. Ross petitioned for habeas corpus on the ground that his constitutional rights were denied because of the refusal of the trial court to order a complete statement of facts at public expense upon his appeal from a judgment of conviction of first-degree murder. We…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eskridge v. Washington State Board of Prison Terms & ParolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. In RE WOODS v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Ross v. SchnecklothSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. In RE GRADY v. SchnecklothWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of Ross v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. RossWashington Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API