Legal Opinion

William Fred Dryden, Sam Alta Dryden, Newman Grady Albright, Edward E. Jackson, Luther Tate Conner and James Daniel v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 26, 1956No. 15995_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal presents as the sole allegation of error the trial court’s permitting a government witness, whose impeachment had been sought, to attempt to explain away on redirect examination two state court convictions. Appellants contend that once they have drawn from a witness the damaging admission that he has been convicted, it was reversible error for the witness to be permitted to explain away the effect of such convictions.

No federal decision is cited to support the appellants’ contention. It is generally recognized that there is a wide discretion in the trial court as to the extent to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. BoyerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  2. Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. HaleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1898

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Veiser v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. United States v. Richard Plante, United States of America v. Bruce TrantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
  3. United States v. Lawrence A. Crisafi and Frank GuglielminiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  4. Commonwealth v. CrearySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. United States v. Peter C. PesanoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API