Legal Opinion
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Brooks
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided December 11, 1975No. Civ. A. CA-3-7898-DPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROBERT M. HILL, Judge.
The above cause came on for trial before a jury and each of the parties has moved for a judgment in its favor. The court is of the opinion that judgment should be entered in favor of the plaintiff, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (hereinafter “Merrill Lynch”), against the defendant, E. B. Brooks, Jr. (hereinafter “Brooks”), for the amount claimed.
By their answers to special interrogatories the jury found that:(1) Merrill Lynch negligently maintained Brooks’ commodity account in an under margin condition (Question 1); and,(2) Such negligence was a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Clara Goldenberg, Formerly Clara Littman v. Bache and Company, Bache and Company v. Clara Goldenberg, Formerly Clara LittmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Securities Investment Co. v. Finance Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Paul C. Teas, Jr. v. Mildred KimballCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,990 Mitchell A. Aboussie v. Tanal A. Aboussie and Camal A. AboussieCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Weis v. OffenbergerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. E. B. Brooks, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v. PerelleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Reynolds Securities, Inc. v. MacQuownDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v. PerelleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986