Third National Bank v. Dorset Marble Co.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Assumpsit on the common counts. This was a collection suit, and by agreement of parties judgment was rendered for the plaintiff at the September Term, 1884, and the cause continued for assessment. Hearing, September Term, 1885, Veazey, J., presiding. Judgment pro forma for the amount claimed in the specifications. Exception by defendant.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Walker, J.
The two foregoing causes were heard together, and the same questions arise in each.
The declarations contained only the common counts in assumpsit. The writs were returnable at the September Term of Rutland County Court, 1884. Specifications were filed in each case, in accordance with the rule of said *71County Court, ten days before the entry of said causes in court; which specifications contained full copies of the notes upon which the plaintiff sought to recover, and a statement that the plaintiff claimed judgment in each cause only upon the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bradley v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Vermont · 1859
- Sweet v. McDanielsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1867
3Cited by2 opinions
- Yatter v. MillerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1888
- Granite Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Parry & JonesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1911