Legal Opinion

Fry v. Clow

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1889PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Monroe county court. Action by James W. Fry against Elijah L. Clow for the conversion of a piano and stool. Plaintiff appeals from an order dismissing his complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtDwight, J.

The action was for the conversion of a piano and stool. The complaint alleged property in the plaintiff, the right to immediate possession, and that the same was duly demanded by him and refused by the defendant. The answer, among other things, denied the allegation of demand and refusal, and pleaded the statute of limitations. The defendant came into the possession of the property in 1874, under a written contract with the plaintiff’s assignors, (D. L. Fry So Co.,) by which he was to pay for its use the sum of $425, in installments of $50 every six months, with interest annually on the sum…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. . the Mayor, Etc., of City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Roberts v. . BerdellNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Roberts v. BerdellNew York Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gregory v. FichtnerNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API