Legal Opinion
State v. Andrews
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 14, 2007No. 24100PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
[¶ 1.] Raymond Andrews appeals his conviction for operating a boat with 0.08% or more by weight of alcohol in his blood. He challenges the constitutionality of the statute making this conduct a criminal offense. We affirm because he has failed to preserve this issue for appellate review.
FACTS
[¶2.] In September 2005 Andrews was charged with alternative counts of operating a boat while under the influence of alcohol or with 0.08% or more by weight of alcohol in his blood. Andrews initially pled not guilty and requested a jury trial. Jury selection began on January 18, 2006. During voir dire, a…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. OutkaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. RoedderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- People v. FordColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- Okerson v. Common Council of Hot SpringsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. LedbetterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.