Chastang v. Moog

(after stating the facts).

The hill as last amended seeks to redeem from the tax sale made in 1920, and to settle and quiet the complainants’ title. Appellants’ right to redeem is conceded by the defendant, appellee here, and the controversy between the parties is in respect to the amount of money chargeable to the complainants as a prerequisite to their right to redeem and have the title quieted.

Appellants insist that they should not he required to pay more than the amount of the taxes assessed against the property for the year 1920, the penalty and the costs, charges and fees 'of officers…