Ferguson-Steere Motor Co. v. STATE CORPORATION COM'N
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SADLER, Justice.
'This represents the third opinion prepared on this appeal. The first one was on the motion of one of the defendants, C.R. Scott Oil Company, to make State Corporation Commission a defendant. The motion was denied and, deeming the absent party indispensable, the judgment was affirmed. Subsequently, upon motion of the C. R. Scott Company and for good cause shown, the appeal was reopened and following further argument the opinion on file was withdrawn, the position taken therein was reversed and an order entered making State Corporation Commission a party defendant. See…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Florida v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Wichita Railroad & Light Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Ewell v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Qwest Corp. v. New Mexico Public Regulation CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
- Stennis v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010
- Ferguson-Steere Motor Co. v. State Corporation Com'nNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957