Legal Opinion
People v. Danton
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 2, 2010PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Marcy L. Kahn, J.
Defendants in the three above-captioned cases were each convicted in separate prosecutions of class B drug felonies and received indeterminate terms of imprisonment in accordance with the laws in effect prior to January 13, 2005. They now move for resentencing pursuant to the Drug ¡Law Reform Act of 2009 (DLRA-3) (L 2009, ch 56, part AAA, § 9 [codified at CPL 440.46]). While conceding that each defendant satisfies the general statutory eligibility criteria of Criminal Procedure Law § 440.46 (1), the People have nonetheless opposed the applications in each…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kurcsics v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. MorseNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Roberts v. Tishman Speyer Properties, L.P.New York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Pultz v. EconomakisNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- People v. GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. SosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. JordanNew York Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. DantonNew York Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. SantanaNew York Supreme Court · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.