Medical Laundry Service v. Board of Trustees
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Per curiam
The issue to be addressed in this opinion is whether plaintiff has a legally protected property interest, which is a prerequisite to plaintiffs procedural due process claim brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In order to establish a procedural due process claim under the Fourteenth Amendment for deprivation of property, plaintiff must show that its contract with the state constitutes a protected property interest.
Plaintiff Medical Laundry Service held a contract with the University of Alabama in Birmingham for provision of laundry services to University hospitals in Birmingham. The contract…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hutchinson v. Board of Trustees of University of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- General Services v. Little-Tex InsulationTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Medical Laundry Service v. The Board Of Trustees Of The University Of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Key West Harbour Development Corp. v. City of Key WestDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1990
- General Services Commission v. Little-Tex Insulation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- General Services Commission v. Little-Tex Insulation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2001