Legal Opinion

Horne v. Golden Empire Transit

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 13, 2020No. 1:19-cv-01209Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 MICHAEL HORNE, Case No. 1:19-cv-01209-DAD-EPG 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, 12 RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE v. DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS AND FOR 13 FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM GOLDEN EMPIRE TRANSIT 14 (ECF No. 1) Defendant. 15 OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN 16 TWENTY-ONE DAYS 17 18 Plaintiff, Michael Horne (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed the 19 complaint initiating this action on September 3, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) 20 For the reasons described below, the Court recommends that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Cato v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API