Legal Opinion

Martin v. Hoskins

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided June 20, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

The bill in this case was brought by complainants, J. K. Martin et al., asserting the right to use and enjoy a right-of wav or road over a tract of land belonging to tbe defendants, T. M. Hoskins et al., and to enjoin them from obstructing it.

Complainants prayed for a mandatory injunction requiring the defendant, T. M. Hoskins, to remove a fence which he had constructed across the road in question. Upon the filing of the bill a flat was granted, a mandatory injunction issued, and said defendant ■removed the fence.

The complainant, J. K. Martin, and the defendant, T. M. Hoskins, are the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McKinney v. DuncanTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Saunders v. SimpsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Fowler v. PrewittCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1801

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. House v. CloseCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1961
  2. Keebler v. StreetCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1984
  3. Montesi v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API