Legal Opinion

Lacoparra v. Bellino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 10, 2001PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for reformation of a deed, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rock-land County (Sherwood, J.), dated July 9, 2001, as granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

To reform a written instrument based upon mutual mistake or fraud, the proponent of reformation must show, by clear and convincing evidence, “not only that mistake or fraud exists, but exactly what was really agreed upon between the parties” (Backer Mgt.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chimart Associates v. PaulNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. George Backer Management Corp. v. Acme Quilting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. K.I.D.E. Associates, Ltd. v. Garage Estates Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. Schultz v. HourihanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Romeo v. Tsunis Hotel PartnersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lacoparra v. BellinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API