Legal Opinion
Town of Branford v. Barbara
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 16, 2010No. SC 18090PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
The question raised by this appeal is whether the offer of judgment statute, General Statutes (Rev. to 2005) § 52-192a,1 applies in the context of con*806demnation appeals. The plaintiffs, Thomas Santa Barbara, Jr., and Frank Perrotti, Jr., the owners of real property (owners) condemned by the defendant town of Branford (town),* 2 appeal from the judgment of the trial court sustaining the town’s objection to the owners’ offer of judgment.3 The owners claim that the court improperly concluded, on the basis of its determination that the offer of judgment statute conflicts with…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Thibodeau v. Design Group One Architects, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Saunders v. FirtelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Freeman v. Alamo Management Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Dilieto v. County Obstetrics & Gynecology Group, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- New England Estates, LLC v. Town of BranfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- In Re Jan Carlos D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Hasychak v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Straw Pond Associates, LLC v. Fitzpatrick, Mariano & Santos, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.