Legal Opinion

People v. Santiago

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 5, 2012PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*439Defendant’s failure to appeal the 2004 conviction did not constitute a forfeiture of his right to independently challenge its constitutionality within the context of a predicate felony proceeding (see People v Johnson, 196 AD2d 408, 410 [1993], lv denied 82 NY2d 806 [1993] [“Notwithstanding his failure to appeal from the 1985 conviction, defendant had an independent statutory right to challenge its use as a predicate conviction on the ground it was unconstitutionally obtained”]). Although the absence of an appeal may be a relevant consideration in predicate felony offender proceedings, it is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. ConcepcionNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. People v. LaFontaineNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. People v. ChavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. People v. OdomAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. GerardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. People v. BrewingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. People v. AgardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  4. People v. ProvinceNew York Supreme Court · 2015
  5. People v. DennisNew York Supreme Court · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API