Fuller v. Favorite Theaters Co. of Salt Lake
Utah Supreme Court
1Per curiam
After a pretrial hearing in the lower court, the trial judge dismissed the action upon two grounds: First, that the complaint did not state a cause of action; and second, that the cause of action upon which the plaintiff bases his complaint was not assignable. Plaintiff appeals to review that ruling.
From the briefs and the oral arguments, it appears that the court based its ruling on both grounds upon this provision of the contract: “Sixth: This license shall not be assigned by either party without the written consent of the other, and the sale or transfer by the exhibitor of all or any part…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- LeTulle v. ScofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- In re Minnesota Valley Canning Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
3Cited by9 opinions
- SME Industries, Inc. v. Thompson, Ventulett, Stainback & Associates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
- U.S. Industries, Inc. v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Folgers Architects Ltd. v. KernsNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Ford v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
- U.S. Industries, Inc. v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.