Legal Opinion

Basquall v. The City of Carlisle

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided August 20, 1889PublishedCited by 21 opinions

In Admiralty. Libel for damages for injuries sustained, and neglect and maltreatment thereafter.

1Opinion of the CourtDeady, J.

William Basquall, a minor, by his guardian, Frederick V. Holman, brings this suit against the British bark City of Carlisle, and her master, C. D. Moore, to recover $15,000 damages, for an injury sustained by him on board said bark, and neglect and maltreatment thereafter.

The charge in the libel is shortly this: In sending the main lower topsail down on one occasion, the work was so carelessly and negligently done as to cause the starboard clew-iron thereof to strike the libelant on the head and fracture his skull; and thereafter the master failed to give or procure for the libelant such…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. The BelgenlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. The Marianna FloraSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  4. Reed v. CanfieldU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1832
  5. The DirectorDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Canada Malting Co. v. Paterson Steamships, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Atlantic Sounding Co. v. TownsendSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Warren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Dutra Group v. BattertonSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  5. McBride Ex Rel. I.M.S. v. Estis Well Service, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API