Kemira, Inc. v. A-C Compressor Corp.
District Court, S.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALAIMO, District Judge.
In this diversity action, plaintiffs seek to recover indemnification for payments it made in a prior suit for injuries to defendant’s employee. The alleged indemnification arises pursuant to a contract wherein Kemira, Inc. (“Kemira”), purchased the services of defendant’s employee.
The case is presently before the Court on defendant’s motion and plaintiffs’ cross-motion for summary judgment on the issue of indemnification. For reasons discussed below, both motions will be DENIED. FACTS
This case is a prime example of one calling for interpretation of the language of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Perry v. PayneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
- John Thrasher v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Moses-Ecco Company, Inc. v. Roscoe-Ajax Corporation, Roscoe-Ajax Corporation v. Charles DetwilerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Buchwald v. University of MinnesotsaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Watson v. Union Camp Corp.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1994