Legal Opinion

Gastelum v. TJX Companies

District Court, S.D. California

Decided January 19, 2023No. 3:21-cv-01435Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FERNANDO GASTELUM, Case No.: 21CV1435-GPC(BLM) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 13 v. MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND 14 TJX COMPANIES dba HOMEGOODS DENYING REQUEST FOR SAN DIEGO, 15 SANCTIONS Defendant. 16 [REDACTED – ORIGINAL FILED 17 UNDER SEAL] 18 [Dkt. No. 49.] 19 20 Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to enforce settlement and for sanctions. 21 (Dkt. No. 49.) Plaintiff filed a response. (Dkt. No. 53.) Defendant replied. (Dkt. No. 22 55.) Based on the reasoning below, the Court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Claire E. Doi v. Halekulani Corporation, Dba Waikiki Parc HotelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Callie v. NearCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Marks-Foreman v. Reporter Publishing Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API