Legal Opinion

Whitaker v. Louisville Transit Company

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided January 10, 1955PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMBS, Justice.

The respective rights of Blue Motor Coach Lines and the Louisville Transit Company to maintain bus service in the Camp Taylor area of Louisville are in issue. The state Department of Motor Transportation held that both companies had the right to render such service. The circuit court held that the Louisville Transit Company had such right but that Blue Motor Coach Lines did not. Blue Motor has appealed. The City of Louisville, as one of the appellees, has filed a brief in which it is argued, in effect, that the judgment should be affirmed.

Blue Motor, since 1935, has maintained…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Deposit Bank of Owensboro v. Daveiss CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
  3. San Francisco-Oakland Terminal Railways v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Williams v. NallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
  5. People's Transit Co. v. Louisville Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
  2. Delta Electric Power Ass'n v. Mississippi Power & Light Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Moore v. BabbCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
  4. Clarice-Washington Electric Membership Corp. v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  5. Application of Omaha Transit CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API