Legal Opinion
In re Dilmaghani
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 28, 2010PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the Third Judicial Department on April 15, 1997, and at all times relevant to this matter has maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.
Although admitted in 1997, respondent did not begin to practice law until October 2003, when he became an associate at the Furman Law Firm, which concentrated in postconviction motion practice in criminal matters. The principal of the Fur-man Law Firm was Daniel Furman, who employed as an associate, in addition to respondent,…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- In re DanasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re IoannouAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re MooreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- In re SoroteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- In re BergerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- In re PayneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- In re RudrakumaranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Matter of SchlisselAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019