Davis v. City of Rome
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action, for damages; from Floyd superior court—Judge Wright. January 15, 1918.
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, J.
1. The writ of error in this case having been originally filed in the Supreme Court, and that court having by formal order transferred it to this court, the transfer of the case is equivalent to a holding by the Supreme Court that the constitutional questions which the plaintiff in error attempts to raise by the writ are not properly made.
2. Under the ruling made by the Supreme Court in Marks v. Rome, 145 Ga. 399 (2) (89 8. E. 324), the charter for that municipality establishes a recorder’s court. Furthermore, if one in point of fact has been tried, convicted, and sentenced by the municipal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Calwell v. City of BooneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- Gray v. Mayor of GriffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Peters v. City of LindsborgSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
- Gillmor v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1907
- Bartlett v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Archer v. City of AustellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
- City of Thomson v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- City of Atlanta v. FryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Boone v. City of ColumbusCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Bagwell v. City of GainesvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.