Legal Opinion

Celotex Co. v. Chicago Panelstone Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 1, 1931No. 2887PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATFIELD, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal in a trade-mark opposition proceeding from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents dismissing the opposition of appellant and holding that appellee was entitled to the registration of the mark “Opal-Tex” for use on ornamental wall board.

In its application for registration, filed November 27, 1928, appellee alleged that it had us'ed its alleged trade-mark “Opal-Tex” since June 4, 1928.

In its notice of opposition, appellant alleged that it was the owner of the trade-mark “Celotex” for use on wall board and similar building materials; that its…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Steel Foundries v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. HockmeyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Celotex Co. v. MillingtonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  2. Yeasties Products, Inc. v. General Mills, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
  3. Buckeye Soda Co. v. Oakite Products, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
  4. Gaylord Products, Inc. v. Golding Wave Clip Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API