Legal Opinion

Wade v. Love

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1888No. 2444PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Nueces. Tried below before the Hon. J. C. Russell. The opinion states so much of what is contained in a voluminous record, as is necessary to a proper understanding of the legal propositions decided.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaines, Associate Justice.

The appellee brought this suit against appellant to recover an undivided one-third interest in a tract of land. Her original title was derived by inheritance from her father and mother, Joseph and Margaret Love. After the ordinary averments of an action of trespass to try title, she alleged in her petition that one F. L. Bates, who was her relative, and in whom she had confidence, procured her to sign a deed conveying to him her interest in the land by representing that the instrument was only a power of attorney; that she was only nineteen years of age at the time,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. M. C. Lee & Co. v. WilmerdingTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  2. St. Louis, Arkansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Whitaker & BonnerTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Buford v. BostickTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Mills v. HerndonTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Marx & Kempner v. Heidenheimer Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Williams v. SapiehaTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Bullock v. SprowlsTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. RichardsTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  5. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. GeorgeTexas Supreme Court · 1892

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API