Legal Opinion

Moustakas v. Noble

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1999PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for discrimination in housing under the New York State Human Rights Law, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, *603Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), entered January 14, 1998, which granted that branch of the motion of the defendants James Kendrick Noble, III, Karen Upton Noble, and Battle Fowler, L. L. P., which was for summary judgment dismissing the second and fourth causes of action in the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The court properly granted that branch of the motion…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sanders v. WinshipNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. State Division of Human Rights v. MuiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alter v. LevineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Mounessa v. Promenade Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Moustakas v. NobleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API