City of Choctaw v. Oklahoma Municipal Assurance Group
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtWinchester, J.
{1 In a dispute over insurance coverage between the plaintiff/appellee, City of Choe taw, and its insurer, Oklahoma Municipal Assurance Group (OMAG), defendant/appellant, the trial court granted a motion for summary judgment for Choctaw. Both in the trial court and on appeal, the city argued that OMAG should cover an inverse condemnation judgment entered against the city in a suit brought by a landowner, even though the city admits it obtained coverage from OMAG for liability imposed under the Governmental Tort Claims Act, 51 0.8.2011, §§ 151-172 (GTCA).
12 The court also found that OMAG was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Barton v. City of Midwest CityCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
3Cited by5 opinions
- Board of County Commissioners v. Association of County Commissioners of Oklahoma Self-Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- ROCKET PROPERTIES v. LaFORTUNESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022
- ROCKET PROPERTIES v. LaFORTUNESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022
- ROCKET PROPERTIES v. LaFORTUNESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022
- BD. OF CTY. COMMISSIONERS v. ASSOC. OF CTY. COMMISSIONERS OF OKLA. SELF-INSUR. GROUPSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014