Legal Opinion

City of Choctaw v. Oklahoma Municipal Assurance Group

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 22, 2013No. 109,288PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinchester, J.

{1 In a dispute over insurance coverage between the plaintiff/appellee, City of Choe taw, and its insurer, Oklahoma Municipal Assurance Group (OMAG), defendant/appellant, the trial court granted a motion for summary judgment for Choctaw. Both in the trial court and on appeal, the city argued that OMAG should cover an inverse condemnation judgment entered against the city in a suit brought by a landowner, even though the city admits it obtained coverage from OMAG for liability imposed under the Governmental Tort Claims Act, 51 0.8.2011, §§ 151-172 (GTCA).

12 The court also found that OMAG was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barton v. City of Midwest CityCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Board of County Commissioners v. Association of County Commissioners of Oklahoma Self-Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  2. ROCKET PROPERTIES v. LaFORTUNESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022
  3. ROCKET PROPERTIES v. LaFORTUNESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022
  4. ROCKET PROPERTIES v. LaFORTUNESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2022
  5. BD. OF CTY. COMMISSIONERS v. ASSOC. OF CTY. COMMISSIONERS OF OKLA. SELF-INSUR. GROUPSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API