Legal Opinion

Brasslavsky v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 9, 1924PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

This is an action to recover compensation for personal injuries sustained by a passenger on one of the *404defendant’s cars. The declaration alleged that while the plaintiff was such passenger “ a fuse blew out, on account of the negligence of the defendant, its servants or agents ” in failing to exercise such inspection of the car as would have revealed the defective condition of the fuse.

There was evidence tending to show that there was “ a shock like a cannon,” a loud noise and a fire, and that the light in the car went out. Several witnesses testified in various forms of words to the noise…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ridenour v. H. C. Dexter Chair Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Cotter v. Boston, Revere Beach & Lynn RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  3. Granara v. JacobsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  4. Wallace v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  5. Park & Pollard Co. v. Agricultural InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Weiner v. D. A. Schulte, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. DesLauries v. SheaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Reilly v. Selectmen of BlackstoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Aldworth v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Rayden Engineering Corp. v. ChurchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API