Legal Opinion · Dissent

Southwestern Transfer Company v. Slay

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 28, 1970No. 7146Published

1DissentStephenson, Justice

I respectfully dissent. I would hold that plaintiff sustained his burden under Subdivision 23, Article 1995, V.A.C.S.

There being no findings of fact or conclusions of law, it is presumed the trial court found all fact issues raised by the evidence in favor of the judgment. In determining the sufficiency of the evidence to support the trial court’s judgment, it is our duty to examine the testimony in the light most favorable to appellee and to indulge every reasonable inference in support of the judgment. Banks v. Collins, 152 Tex. 265, 257 S.W.2d 97 (1953).

The facts alleged and proved in this…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Compton v. ElliottTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Banks v. CollinsTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Honea, by Next Friend v. Coca Cola Bot. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Wichita Falls Traction Co. v. ElliottTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Goodrich v. Superior Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1951

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API