Queen v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.
From a conviction in the county court of Dewey county on a charge of selling intoxicating liquor, the plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, has appealed.
The only question raised is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict. The principal evidence on the part of the state is that of Fred Horton, who was employed and deputized by the sheriff of Dewey county to discover violations of the liquor law. He testified that he went to the residence of the defendant, purchased from him a quart of whisky, and paid for it a sum of $2.50, and that' he took the whisky and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cochran and Blevins v. United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- Cole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919
3Cited by17 opinions
- Daniels v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
- Langley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1932
- Humphrey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969
- Goodnight v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1961
- Lombness v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.