Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Heinze

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 27, 1917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 1, 1917, which affirmed an order of the Saratoga County Surrogate’s Court denying an application by appellant herein for leave to intervene in proceedings by the administrator to sell personal property which he claimed belonged to the estate of F. Augustus Heinze, deceased.

Read the full summary

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 1, 1917, which affirmed an order of the Saratoga County Surrogate’s Court denying an application by appellant herein for leave to intervene in proceedings by the administrator to sell personal property which he claimed belonged to the estate of F. Augustus Heinze, deceased. Appellant claimed to be the owner of the property by reason of purchase by it from the administratrix of the estate, who was the predecessor of the respondent Fullerton.

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Cuddeback, Cardozo, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nervo v. MealeyNew York Supreme Court · 1940
  2. In re the Estate of CohnNew York Surrogate's Court · 1947