Legal Opinion
In re Ice S.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 6, 2006PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In two related child abuse proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the Law Guardian appeals, as limited by his notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Richardson, J.), dated November 12, 2004, as upon determining the nonparty appellant’s motion to prohibit the father from having any contact with the subject children, granted the father supervised telephone contact with the children.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
Under Family Court Act § 1030 (c), a parent who is a party…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rosario WW. v. Ellen WW.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Anaya v. HundleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re Nicholas GG.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Crowell v. LivzieyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by9 opinions
- Franklin v. RicheyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re Female F.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Madden v. RuskiewiczAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- N.M. v. R.G.New York Supreme Court · 2014
- In re Nyla W.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.