Le Suer v. Le Suer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Three actions for partition in the district court for Pipestone county. The cases were tried before Nelson, J., who made findings and ordered judgment in favor of intervener Asiesen in one case and of the defendants.in the other cases. Prom orders denying new trials, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
The above actions were tried together and all three are submitted to this court upon one record.
Erastus P. Le Suer died June 23, 1910. In his lifetime, his wife, Julia, joining with him therein, he conveyed to third persons three different parcels of land formerly owned by him. Through mesne conveyances, intervener Asiesen has become the owner of one of these parcels, defendant Lock of another, and defendant Julia Le Suer of the other. After his death, appellant, alleging that she is the surviving wife of Le Suer; that she had not joined in the conveyances made by him; and that, as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hulett v. CareySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- State v. WorthinghamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- In re Terry's EstateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Heminway v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
3Cited by5 opinions
- Boehm v. RohlfsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
- Campbell v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- In Re Estate of LustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Agnew v. AgnewSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- In Re Estate of NoserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930