Legal Opinion
Acosta v. Local 101, Transp. Workers Union of Am. Afl-Cio
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 10, 2018No. 18-cv-319-ARR-RMLPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSS, United States District Judge:
Plaintiff, the Secretary of Labor, instituted this action under the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act ("the LMRDA"). The lawsuit arises from a recent officer election conducted by Local 101, Transport Workers Union of America AFL-CIO ("Local 101"). Baron Marquis, a member of the union in good standing at the time of the election, was disqualified as a candidate for president after he failed to timely file a letter of acceptance1 with Local 101 confirming his nomination and intent to run. He protested his disqualification to several internal union…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Richard Morales v. Quintel Entertainment, Inc. And Peter StolzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Graham v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chavez-DeRemer v. Protective Service Officers UnitedDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025
- Kelly v. International Union of Operating Engineers Local 30District Court, E.D. New York · 2020
- Su v. Protective Service Officers UnitedDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
- WALSH v. EASTERN MONTGOMERY COUNTY AREA LOCAL 2233, AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIODistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- Walsh v. International Longshoremen's Association, Local 1970District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2022