Legal Opinion

State v. Ross

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 30, 2004PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Bruce Ross appeals from a judgment of the District Court (Rumford, McElwee, J.) convicting him of assault (Class D), 17-A M.R.S.A. § 207(1)(A) (Supp.2003). We dismiss Ross’s appeal for his failure to file an appendix in accordance with M.RApp. P. 8(g). Specifically, to the extent Ross is appealing from the trial court’s grant of a motion to amend the complaint, Ross has failed to include that ruling as required by *815Rule 8(g)(3), and has also failed to include the criminal complaint as required by Rule 8(g)(4); nor does the appendix include the docket entries, the judgment, or the complaint on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Town of Baldwin v. CarterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Flint A. Hutchinson v. Christina A. BruyereSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  2. State of Maine v. Sanford R. King IIISupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  3. Lowd v. DimoulasSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  4. David E. Major v. Wen Yih ChiangSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  5. State v. DominiqueSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API